Which emoji go against the grain of their text?
Source:R/emoji-incongruity.R
emoji_incongruity_profile.Rdemoji_incongruity_profile() aggregates emoji_incongruity() by glyph: for
each emoji, how far from its host text's sentiment it typically sits, and how
often it appears with the opposite polarity. Those are the candidate irony
markers in your corpus.
Arguments
- data
A data frame or tibble containing a text column.
- text
The text column to scan, supplied unquoted.
- text_score
Unquoted numeric column holding the text's own sentiment.
- method
"difference"(default) for the continuous gap, or"sign_flip"for the categorical polarity-flip feature.- scale
How to make the two scores comparable:
"rank","zscore"or"none". Required – there is no sensible default.- where
"all"(default) scores every emoji in the row;"final"scores only the trailing run of emoji that ends the text.- threshold
For
method = "difference", the absolute gap at or above which.emoji_incongruentisTRUE. Default1, a full polarity swing on the rank scale.- min_n
Minimum number of scored occurrences for an emoji to be reported. Default
5.
Value
A tibble with one row per emoji: emoji, name, n (scored
occurrences), mean_incongruity, sd_incongruity, n_flips and
flip_rate, sorted by descending flip_rate.
Details
Incongruity is a property of a row, so every emoji in a row is credited with
that row's gap. A glyph that habitually shares a message with a genuinely
incongruent one will therefore inherit some of its score; read n alongside
flip_rate before drawing conclusions from a handful of occurrences.
Examples
df <- data.frame(
text = c("great \U0001f621", "lovely \U0001f621", "awful \U0001f621"),
score = c(0.8, 0.7, -0.9)
)
emoji_incongruity_profile(df, text, score, scale = "none", min_n = 1)
#> # A tibble: 1 × 7
#> emoji name n mean_incongruity sd_incongruity n_flips flip_rate
#> <chr> <chr> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <int> <dbl>
#> 1 😡 enraged face 3 -0.373 0.954 2 0.667